Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 February 20243328508

Reaside, Neenton, BRIDGNORTH, WV16 6RL

erection of an agricultural workers dwelling and formation of vehicular access without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref 4/72/1072, dated 16 August 1972

Authority
Shropshire County Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hughes L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the removal of condition 3 would give rise to the need to make a financial contribution for affordable housing

What decided it

The development plan policies CS11 and MD7a unambiguously require an affordable housing contribution when an agricultural occupancy condition is removed, and this requirement is not displaced by the Certificate of Lawful Use or other material considerations.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS11, Policy MD7a, Type and Affordable Housing Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.