Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld14 July 20253328514

71 Green Street, Forest Gate, London, E7 8DA

Planning appeal 3328514 at 71 Green Street, Forest Gate, London, E7 8DA (London Borough of Newham) was dismissed on 14 July 2025 by Inspector Watson S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the front extension on the character and appearance of the area.

Without planning permission the erection of a front extension

Authority
London Borough of Newham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Watson S
Postcode
E7 8DA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the front extension on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the front extension on the vitality and viability of identified town and local centres

What decided it

The poor quality construction and appearance of the extension, which harms the character and appearance of the area in conflict with the development plan and NPPF.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan Policy D1London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy SD6London Plan Policy E9London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy S1London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy S2London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy SP1London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy SP3London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy SP6London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy SP7London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy SP8London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy J1London Borough of Newham Local Plan Policy INF5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

710 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Newham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice varied and upheld3 September 20263363772
    158 Major Road, Stratford, London, E15 1DY
  2. Notice varied and upheld10 August 20263362536
    32 Kerrison Road, London, E15 2TH
  3. Notice upheld5 August 20263362879
    174 Shakespeare Crescent, Manor Park, London, E12 6NB
  4. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263358326
    42 Disraeli Road, Forest Gate, London, E7 9JP
  5. Notice upheld30 July 20263332539
    86 Thackeray Road, London, E6 3BW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.