Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 January 20243328759

5 Grove Lane, Tettenhall Wood, Wolverhampton, None required, WV6 8NH

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Bromley N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the external cladding preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Tettenhall Wood Conservation Area, and in the event that any harm is identified, whether that harm is outweighed by any public benefits of the development
  • the effect of the side facing first floor bedroom window on the living conditions of the occupants of No 1 Grove Lane, with particular reference to privacy

What decided it

The external cladding causes less than substantial harm to the significance of the Tettenhall Wood Conservation Area that is not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the development.

Framework references: 205, 207, 208, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy D8, Policy D9, Policy HE3, Policy HE4, Policy HE5, Policy ENV3, Policy CSP4, Policy D4, Policy H6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.