Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed14 March 20243329117

The Arcade , High Street, Cookham, Maidenhead, Kent, SL6 9TA

Planning appeal 3329117 at The Arcade , High Street, Cookham, Maidenhead, Kent, SL6 9TA (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was allowed on 14 March 2024 by Inspector Catcheside E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Cookham High Street Conservation Area.

Use of building for office space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Catcheside E
Postcode
SL6 9TA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Cookham High Street Conservation Area
  • The effect of the development on highway safety, with particular regard to on-street parking provision

What decided it

The development preserves the character and appearance of the conservation area and does not cause harm to highway safety, with compliance with the development plan policies HE1 and IF2 when read as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE1Policy IF2

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

49 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld24 September 20263353235
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
  2. Notice upheld24 September 20263353234
    Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
  3. Dismissed28 July 20266008433
    Jones House, High Street, Bray, SL6 2AH
  4. Allowed15 July 20266005399
    Land South of Garden Cottage, Fifield Road, Fifield, SL6 2NZ
  5. Dismissed13 May 20266003174
    31 Temple Road, Windsor, SL4 1HP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.