Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 June 20243329121

16 Woodland Way, Harestone Heights, CATERHAM, CR3 6ER

the demolition of the existing dwelling and erection of a replacement dwelling with associated works without complying with conditions attached to planning permission Ref TA/2022/927, dated 28 February 2023

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wright A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether conditions 8 and 9 restricting permitted development rights are reasonable and necessary with regard to: (1) the Green Belt; (2) the character of the area; and (3) the living conditions of neighbouring occupants

What decided it

The Inspector concluded that conditions 8 and 9 failed to meet the NPPF tests of being reasonable and necessary because the GPDO itself contains sufficient safeguards and there was no clear justification to restrict PD rights beyond those inherent limitations.

Framework references: 54, 56

Plan policies cited: CSP18, DP7, DP10, DP13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.