Planning appeal decision
57-63 Alfred Street, Birmingham, B12 8JP
material change of use of part of the premises to provide a takeaway café
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- retail · Change of use
- Inspector
- Jones L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether there is a sequentially preferred location for the appeal development
- The effect of the appeal development on the living conditions of nearby residents with particular reference to noise and disturbance
What decided it
The appellant failed to demonstrate that no suitable and available sites exist in sequentially preferable town centre or edge of centre locations, as the Sequential Assessment was limited by the appellant's own business model requirements rather than genuine necessity.
Framework references: 91, 92
Plan policies cited: Policy TP21, Policy PG3, Policy DM6, Policy DM2, Shopping and Local Centres Supplementary Planning Document (2012)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®