Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld8 November 20243329125

57-63 Alfred Street, Birmingham, B12 8JP

material change of use of part of the premises to provide a takeaway café

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Change of use
Inspector
Jones L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether there is a sequentially preferred location for the appeal development
  • The effect of the appeal development on the living conditions of nearby residents with particular reference to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The appellant failed to demonstrate that no suitable and available sites exist in sequentially preferable town centre or edge of centre locations, as the Sequential Assessment was limited by the appellant's own business model requirements rather than genuine necessity.

Framework references: 91, 92

Plan policies cited: Policy TP21, Policy PG3, Policy DM6, Policy DM2, Shopping and Local Centres Supplementary Planning Document (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.