Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 July 20243329316

28 Southampton Street , Reading , RG1 2QL

Planning appeal 3329316 at 28 Southampton Street , Reading , RG1 2QL (Reading Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 July 2024 by Inspector Willis S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of St Giles Court with regard to outlook, privacy, daylight and sunlight, No 26-28 with regard to privacy, and No 34-38 with regard to outlook, disturbance, sunlight, daylight and odour.

to redevelop the site for a three storey building to provide 6 x 1-bedroom flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Willis S
Postcode
RG1 2QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of St Giles Court with regard to outlook, privacy, daylight and sunlight, No 26-28 with regard to privacy, and No 34-38 with regard to outlook, disturbance, sunlight, daylight and odour
  • Whether appropriate living conditions would be provided for future occupiers with regard to privacy, outlook, noise and disturbance, daylight and sunlight, odour and outdoor space
  • Whether the proposed development provides an appropriate mix of housing with regard to the local development strategy
  • Whether the proposed development would encourage the use of a range of transport options, with regard to cycle storage provision
  • Whether the proposed development would make appropriate provision for affordable housing
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the setting of nearby listed buildings and Market Place/London Street Conservation Area (CA)

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to living conditions of both existing occupiers at St Giles Court and No 34-38, and the failure to provide appropriate living conditions for future occupiers, combined with failures on housing mix, cycle storage and affordable housing, collectively outweigh the modest benefits of housing supply.

The modest benefits of housing supply contribution and efficient land use were outweighed by significant harm to living conditions of existing and future occupiers, moderate harm from lack of housing mix and transport options, and failure to provide affordable housing.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC8Policy EN16Policy CC5Policy H2Policy RC9Policy H9Policy CC7Policy TR5Policy H3Policy CC9Policy EN1Policy CR2Policy H10Policy EN14
Judgments
Choiceplace Properties Limited v SoS (2021)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

185 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Reading Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed19 October 20266002958
    Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
  2. Allowed19 October 20266002957
    Pavement O/S 201 Broad Street, Reading, RG1 7QA
  3. Dismissed19 October 20266002956
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266002955
    Pavement O/S The Range,, Vastern Road,, Reading, RG1 8AL
  5. Dismissed25 September 20266014625
    65a Bedford Road, Reading, RG1 7EX

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.