Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Murrells End Farm, Murrells End, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3DF
Planning appeal 3329458 at Land to the South of Murrells End Farm, Murrells End, Hartpury, Gloucester, GL19 3DF (Forest of Dean District Council) was dismissed on 10 July 2024 by Inspector Kirby R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
installation and operation a of a renewable energy generating station comprising ground-mounted photovoltaic solar arrays together with inverter units, substation, site access, internal access tracks, security measures, access gates, other ancillary infrastructure and landscaping and biodiversity enhancements
- Authority
- Forest of Dean District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- utilities-energy · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Kirby R
- Postcode
- GL19 3DF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby occupiers
- the effect of the proposal on the use of best and most versatile agricultural land (BMV)
- the effect of the proposal on protected species, notably skylarks
- the effect of the proposal on the significance of non-designated and designated heritage assets
- whether, in light of the above issues and other matters, the planning balance falls in favour of, or against, planning permission being granted for the proposal
What decided it
The unresolved and uncertain harm to skylark territories (a protected, red-listed species) combined with the unjustified use of a large area of Best and Most Versatile agricultural land outweighed the benefits of the scheme.
the significant benefits of renewable energy provision, biodiversity net gain and other benefits did not individually or cumulatively outweigh the harm to skylarks and the unjustified use of BMV land, so the proposal conflicted with the development plan taken as a whole, notwithstanding that heritage harm was outweighed by public benefits
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CSP.1CSP.2AP 1AP 2AP 4AP 5AP 7AP 8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 180Paragraph 181Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Forest of Dean
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed23 September 20266008171Land Adjacent to Parkend Club, Castlemain, Parkend, GL15 4JZ
- Dismissed5 August 2026600873111 The Scarr, Newent, GL18 1DQ
- Dismissed20 July 20266006083Land At 33 High Street, Lydney, GL15 5DP
- Dismissed20 July 20266005801Land Adjacent Swan House Tea Room, Cone Valley, Woolaston, GL15 6AD
- Dismissed8 July 20266001129Land Between Redhouse and Bluebell Cottage, Brockhollands,, Bream, GL15 4PP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®