Planning appeal decision
298 - 300 , Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1HT
Planning appeal 3329470 at 298 - 300 , Brixton Hill, London, SW2 1HT (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 7 May 2024 by Inspector Gee R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the loss of office floorspace is justified.
provision of 7no. residential units at first, second and third floors with alterations to back addition and reversion to commercial space (Class E) at ground floor
- Authority
- London Borough of Lambeth
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gee R
- Postcode
- SW2 1HT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the loss of office floorspace is justified
- Whether the development would achieve the highest standards of fire safety
- The effect on the living conditions of the future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to internal and external space standards
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, with particular regard to noise and air quality
- The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the existing occupiers of No 296 Brixton Hill and the future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to levels of daylight and sunlight
- Whether there is appropriate provision for bicycle parking
- Whether the proposal would comprise car-free development to support the safe and efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site with particular regard to provision for parking
- Whether the proposal would prejudice the future development of the adjacent site Nos 300A to 304 Brixton Hill, having particular regard to outlook
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan on multiple material grounds including loss of employment land without justification, failure to meet space standards, inadequate fire safety consideration, unacceptable impacts on neighbouring amenity, and insufficient provision for sustainable transport, with no material considerations to outweigh these conflicts.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ED1Policy E1Policy D12(A)Policy D6Policy H5Policy Q2Policy Q7Policy T5Policy D4Policy T3Policy Q13Policy T1Policy T6
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed16 October 2026600969928 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
- Dismissed9 September 20266007861The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
- Dismissed7 September 20266008038Selway House, 272 South Lambeth Road, London, SW8 1UL
- Dismissed11 August 2026600935362A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
- Dismissed4 August 20266005042Lidl Store, 71 - 73 Acre Lane, Lambeth, London, SW2 5TN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®