Planning appeal decision
193 Coppermill Road, Staines-upon-thames, Surrey, TW19 5NW
Planning appeal 3329755 at 193 Coppermill Road, Staines-upon-thames, Surrey, TW19 5NW (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 8 April 2025 by Inspector Bond V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal development represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Revised Framework and relevant development plan policies.
Without planning permission, the erection of a front boundary wall with associated piers, and gate in the approximate position marked with a blue line on the attached plan
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Bond V
- Postcode
- TW19 5NW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal development represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Revised Framework and relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the appeal development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect of the appeal development on the character and appearance of the area and on highway safety
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the appeal development
What decided it
The development represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing material harm to openness and character and appearance, with no very special circumstances to justify it.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy IF2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353235Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice upheld24 September 20263353234Sunnyside Stanwell Road, Horton, Slough, SL3 9PE
- Notice varied and upheld17 September 202633621832 Aston Mead, Windsor, SL4 5PW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®