Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 July 20243329837

9 West Road, Malden Rushett, Chessington, KT9 2NR

demolition of bungalow and erection of 2 x 3-bedroomed semi-detached 2-storey houses

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Lawrence R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes limited infilling in a village within the Green Belt, meeting exception (e) of paragraph 154 of the Framework, and therefore is not inappropriate development.

Framework references: 154, 155, 54, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy G2 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DM10 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012), Policy DM5 of the Kingston Core Strategy (2012)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.