Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision14 January 20253329920

65 Heathcote Avenue, HATFIELD, AL10 0RQ

existing rear extension and roof extension with rear dormer

Authority
Welwyn Hatfield Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Not Applicable
Inspector
Shields T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision not to issue a certificate of lawful use or development was well founded, turning on whether the development benefits from permitted development rights under Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Classes A and B of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

What decided it

The roof extension and rear dormer qualify as permitted development under Class B, but the single storey rear extension exceeds the permitted limits and lacks the required prior approval under Class A.4, rendering it unlawful.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.