Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 April 20243330055

32 Rainbow Lane, Stanford-Le-Hope, SS17 0AS

Planning appeal 3330055 at 32 Rainbow Lane, Stanford-Le-Hope, SS17 0AS (Thurrock Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 April 2024 by Inspector Wood T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether suitable mitigation has been ensured to prevent unacceptable effects on a protected site, in accordance with the Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy.

a new dwelling to the south of the existing property, No 32, including associated parking and amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wood T
Postcode
SS17 0AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether suitable mitigation has been ensured to prevent unacceptable effects on a protected site, in accordance with the Essex Coast Recreational Disturbance Avoidance and Mitigation Strategy
  • The effects of the proposal on the character of the area
  • The effects of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The failure to secure the required Essex Coast RAMS mitigation contribution, combined with unacceptable harm to the character of the area, meant the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even under the tilted balance.

The benefits of providing one new home were outweighed by considerable environmental harm in relation to likely harm to a protected site and to the character of the area, such that the proposal would give rise to harm which significantly and demonstrably outweighs its benefits when assessed against the policies in the Framework as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CSTP19Policy PMD2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

71 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Thurrock

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed14 October 20266007809
    23 Carisbrooke Drive, Corringham, SS17 7PL
  2. Allowed5 October 20266008794
    Milo, South Avenue, Langdon Hills, SS16 6JG
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266008679
    Oozedam, High Road, Fobbing, SS17 9HT
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266009919
    Land Rear of Ewen House, High Road, Fobbing, SS17 9JH
  5. Notice upheld24 September 20263368987
    71A Victoria Road, Stanford-Le-Hope, SS17 0HZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.