Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed7 May 20243330145

Plot 10, New Acres, Land North West of Benskins Lane, Romford, RM4 1LB

Planning appeal 3330145 at Plot 10, New Acres, Land North West of Benskins Lane, Romford, RM4 1LB (London Borough of Havering) was allowed on 7 May 2024 by Inspector Child K, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the scheme on the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land within it.

change of use of land for the creation of a 1 Gypsy/Traveller pitch comprising the siting of 1 static caravan, 1 touring caravan and erection of 1 day room, provision of ancillary works, alongside the formation of access

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Child K
Postcode
RM4 1LB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the scheme on the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land within it.
  • The effect of the scheme on the character and appearance of the area.
  • The effect of the scheme on biodiversity.
  • Whether there has been intentional unauthorised development and, if so, what weight should be attached to it.
  • Whether any harm to the Green Belt is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the scheme, including: need for and supply of Gypsy and Traveller sites; availability, suitability, affordability and acceptability of alternative accommodation; policy failure; personal circumstances of the occupants including the best interests of the children, and taking account of human rights and equality.

What decided it

The combination of unmet Gypsy and Traveller pitch need, the Council's conceded lack of five-year pitch supply, absence of alternative accommodation, and the personal circumstances/best interests of the children were found to clearly outweigh the Green Belt and other harm, constituting very special circumstances.

Substantial harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, moderate harm to openness/urban sprawl, limited harm to encroachment, character and appearance, and biodiversity, plus limited weight against intentional unauthorised development, was clearly outweighed by significant weight attached to unmet Gypsy/Traveller need, lack of alternative sites, absence of five-year supply, and substantial weight given to the personal circumstances and best interests of the children, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the grant of permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 11Policy 26Policy 27Policy 29Policy 30Policy G2Policy G6Policy G7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

84 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice varied and upheld4 August 20263360522
    22 Nelmes Crescent, Hornchurch, RM11 2QB
  2. Dismissed4 August 20263359688
    30 Crow Lane, Romford, RM7 0EL
  3. Planning permission granted29 July 20263367840
    5A Myrtle Road, Romford, RM3 8XS
  4. Notice upheld25 June 20263358682
    Chalkfields Tomkyns Lane, Upminster, RM14 1TP
  5. Split Decision23 June 20263377437
    Land Ne Side of Church Road, Noak Hill, Romford, Essex, RM4 1LD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.