Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 April 20243330218

2 Nevada Street, LONDON, SE10 9JL

part two storey, part single storey rear extension, rear dormer extension, extension of existing basement and internal reconfiguration

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Guest H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling
  • whether the proposal would preserve and enhance the West Greenwich Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would protect the Outstanding Universal Value of the Maritime Greenwich World Heritage Site
  • the effect of the proposal on archaeological safeguarding

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the host dwelling and localised harm to the West Greenwich Conservation Area, to which great weight must be given, was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy HC1 of the London Plan, Policy HC2 of the London Plan, Policy DH1 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH(a) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH(h) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH3 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH4 of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014), Policy DH(m) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy and Detailed Policies (2014)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.