Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 March 20253346663

334 Creek Road, Deptford, SE10 9SW

Planning appeal 3346663 at 334 Creek Road, Deptford, SE10 9SW (Royal Borough of Greenwich) was dismissed on 5 March 2025 by Inspector Praine N, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Effects of the proposed development upon assets of archaeological significance.

the demolition of an existing commercial unit and construction of a new 2 storey building plus mansard roof, over basement to provide a commercial unit at ground and basement with 1-bed flat above

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Praine N
Postcode
SE10 9SW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effects of the proposed development upon assets of archaeological significance
  • The character and appearance of the area including the setting and significance of designated and non-designated heritage assets
  • Waste storage and collection

What decided it

The absence of a desk-based archaeological assessment and field evaluation before determination, which prevented the Inspector from being certain of the effects on assets of archaeological significance, conflicting with policies DH(m) and HC1 and outweighing the moderate housing and design benefits under the tilted balance.

The significant harm from conflict with archaeological protection policies was weighed against the modest housing contribution and moderate benefits of well-designed development in a sustainable location; the harm significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits under paragraph 11d) of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DH(m) of the Royal Greenwich Local Plan: Core Strategy with Detailed Policies 2014Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021Policy DH1 of the Core StrategyPolicy DH3 of the Core StrategyPolicy DH4 of the Core StrategyPolicy DH(h) of the Core StrategyPolicy D3 of the London PlanPolicy HC2 of the London PlanPolicy H5 of the Core StrategyPolicy SI7 of the London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 207Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

434 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Greenwich

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Allowed10 March 20253352432
    The Albion, 48 Woolwich Church Street, London, SE18 5NN
  2. Dismissed17 April 20243330218
    2 Nevada Street, London, SE10 9JL
  3. Dismissed23 November 20213248821
    112 Shooters Hill Road, London, SE3 8RN
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266007470
    44 Ceres Road, London, SE18 1HP
  5. Dismissed14 July 20263375007
    Powis Street, Outside no.37 Shaba Hair and Cosmetics, , London, SE18 6HZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.