Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 May 20243330314

Rosedene Cottage , Woldingham Road, CATERHAM, Surrey, CR3 7LA

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Hall C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2023 and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and surrounding area
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal represents inappropriate development in the Green Belt by virtue of being a disproportionate addition to the original building, and the harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and openness, together with harm to character and appearance, is not clearly outweighed by other considerations such that very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy DP10, Policy DP13, Policy CP18, Policy DP7, Policy DP8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.