Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed3 May 20243330317

Richmond Golf Club, Sudbrook Park Sudbrook Lane, Richmond, TW10 7AS

Planning appeal 3330317 at Richmond Golf Club, Sudbrook Park Sudbrook Lane, Richmond, TW10 7AS (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was allowed on 3 May 2024 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and if so, whether the harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development.

the erection of a single storey half-way hut on the grounds of the golf course and the demolition of an existing structure on the golf course

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
O'Connor H
Postcode
TW10 7AS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal constitutes inappropriate development on Metropolitan Open Land (MOL) and if so, whether the harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal satisfied all elements of NPPF paragraph 154b) as an appropriate facility for outdoor sport that would preserve openness and not conflict with the purposes of MOL designation, thereby constituting appropriate development.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G3 of the London Plan, March 2021Policy LP13 of the London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames, Local Plan, July 2018Policy 35 of the emerging Richmond Local Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 154

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

175 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  2. Dismissed6 August 20266007949
    The Lensbury, Broom Road, London, TW11 9NU
  3. Split Decision10 March 20263333609
    Pontoon and Land Adjacent to Richmond Bridge Pier, Richmond Riverside, Richmond, TW9 1TH
  4. Allowed27 January 20266001465
    The Boathouse, Ranelagh Drive, Twickenham, TW1 1QZ
  5. Dismissed21 August 20243345719
    57 Rosecroft Gardens, London, TW2 7PT

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.