Hill House Wills Grove, LONDON, NW7 1QL

the reinstatement of tennis court in rear garden

Authority: London Borough of Barnet
Appeal type: minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure: Written Representations
Development: leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector: Plenty B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies and its effect on the openness of the Green Belt
The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including the woodland landscape character being a woodland subject to Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and the Mill Hill Conservation Area (MHCA)
The effect of the proposal on the Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) and associated biodiversity matters
Whether any harm found to the Green Belt is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to very special circumstances to justify it

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would harm openness, and the harm to the Green Belt is not clearly outweighed by other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist to justify it.

Framework references: 154, 208, 152, 153

Plan policies cited: CS7, DM15, G2, D3, G7, HC1, CSNPPF, CS1, DM01, DM06, G6, DM16

Read the decision letter on the Inspectorate’s site

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

What an account adds

Draw a red line around your site and the appraisal follows.

Heritage. Listed buildings by grade and distance, conservation areas, scheduled monuments, registered parks and gardens, heritage at risk.
Landscape and environment. Green belt, national parks and national landscapes, SSSIs, ancient woodland, SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites, nutrient catchments.
Flooding. Flood zones 2 and 3, surface water, and both again with climate change.
Transport. The 800 metre station catchment and service frequency, bus stops with their weekday frequency, the cycle network, and the Framework’s transport tests measured for the site.

Then the development plan position, the housing land supply as an Inspector last accepted it, and every appeal decided around the site with its letter.

Every English appeal since 2016, with the letter behind it wherever the Inspectorate published one. Searched by meaning as well as by words, with the key case law counted live across the letters.

Casework that chases the deadlines. Applications, appeals and conditions with their statutory dates.

The judgement stays yours. The tool gathers the material and dates it.