Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 May 20243330565

298 Mossley Road, ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, Tameside, OL6 6LP

change of use of existing vacant office floorspace (Use Class E) to a large house in multiple occupation (Use Class Sui Generis) incorporating 12 bedrooms/12 occupants with kitchen and communal living space and associated cycle storage

Authority
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Townend K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for the future occupiers of the property, with regard to internal living space
  • whether or not the proposed development would provide appropriate living conditions for the future occupiers of the property, with regard to external space
  • whether or not the waste storage arrangements comply with local policy and guidance

What decided it

The poor internal kitchen facilities and lack of functional external amenity space would cause significant harm to the living conditions of future occupiers that substantially outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and building reuse.

The adverse impacts from inadequate internal shared living spaces and insufficient external amenity space, afforded significant weight, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate benefits of housing supply and building reuse, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply.

Framework references: 11, 60, 131, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy 1.5 UDP, Policy H10 UDP, Policy RD11 SPD, Policy RD12 SPD, Policy RD14 SPD

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.