Planning appeal decision
Bristol Hotel, Chapel Hill, Clevedon , North Somerset , BS21 7NL
Planning appeal 3330654 at Bristol Hotel, Chapel Hill, Clevedon , North Somerset , BS21 7NL (North Somerset Council) was dismissed on 25 September 2024 by Inspector Walker K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Clevedon Triangle Conservation Area (CA), including the effects of the proposal on the significance of the Bristol Inn as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA).
the erection of three terraced dwellings (Use Class C3) on land to the rear of the existing pub (Sui Generis), including the provision of parking and hard and soft landscaping and the reconfiguration of the public house car park and garden
- Authority
- North Somerset Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Walker K
- Postcode
- BS21 7NL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Clevedon Triangle Conservation Area (CA), including the effects of the proposal on the significance of the Bristol Inn as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers at 10 and 20 Lime Kiln Lane, with regard to outlook, daylight, and sunlight
- whether the proposed development would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers with regard to noise
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
What decided it
The less than substantial but considerable harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset (the Clevedon Triangle Conservation Area) is not outweighed by the modest social and economic benefits of delivering three dwellings, even in the context of the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.
The less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset and moderate localised harm to the non-designated heritage asset, combined with significant harm to the living conditions of existing and future occupiers, outweigh the moderate social and economic benefits of housing delivery, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DM3Policy DM7Policy DM32Policy DM37Policy CS3Policy CS12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 193Paragraph 194Paragraph 208Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North Somerset Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed20 March 20266002250Land and Barn at Warren House, Bath Road, Langford, BS40 5EB
- Allowed9 March 20266003466259, Eastcliff, Portishead, North Somerset, BS20 7AQ
- Dismissed22 December 20253367350Bishops Farm, Bishops Road, Cleeve, North Somerset, BS49 4NF
- Allowed5 December 2025336661645-47 High Street, Nailsea, BS48 1AW
- Dismissed29 September 20253364481131 High Street, Weston Super Mare, BS23 1HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®