Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 July 20243330675

Land adjacent to Broad Street, Icklesham, East Sussex, TN36 4AT

the erection of a split-level two bedroom dwelling with associated parking area and landscaping

Authority
Rother District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Glassar S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is an appropriate location for the proposed development having regard to local policies for the distribution of housing
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The significant harm to the High Weald National Landscape, a nationally designated landscape with the highest status of protection, provided a clear reason for refusal under paragraph 11(d)(i) of the Framework notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply.

The presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d) was disapplied because the significant harm to the National Landscape provided a clear reason for refusal; the appeal was dismissed in accordance with the development plan.

Framework references: 11, 182

Plan policies cited: Policy OSS2, Policy DIM2, Policy RA3, Policy OSS4, Policy RA2, Policy EN1, Policy DEN1, Policy DEN2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.