®Planning appeal decision
Land At Sniperley Park , Pity Me , Durham, DH1 5DZ, DH1 5RH
Planning appeal 3330836 at Land At Sniperley Park , Pity Me , Durham, DH1 5DZ, DH1 5RH (Durham County Council) was allowed on 3 June 2024 by Inspector Hockenhull H, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Masterplanning, provision and timing on infrastructure (Appeals A, B and D).
Demolition of existing buildings adjacent to B6532 and outline planning permission (all matters reserved except for access) for a maximum of 1,550 residential dwellings (Use Class C3), a local centre (Use Classes E and F2), public house (Use Class Sui Generis) and primary school (Use Class F1), compensatory improvements to the Green Belt, associated infrastructure and landscaping . Summary of Recommendation: That the appeal be allowed
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hockenhull H
- Postcode
- DH1 5DZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Masterplanning, provision and timing on infrastructure (Appeals A, B and D)
- Sustainable transport (Appeals A, B and D)
- Education (Appeals A, B and D)
- District heating (Appeals A, B and D)
- Affordable housing (Appeal D)
- Heritage (Appeals B, C and D)
- Ecology
- Poor design, overdevelopment and car parking (Appeal D)
- Highway safety
- Other issues (Appeals A, B and D)
What decided it
The proposals were found to accord with the development plan as a whole (principally CDP Policy 5), and the substantial benefits of housing and economic delivery outweighed the limited landscape harm identified.
Significant weight benefits (housing, affordable housing, economic benefits) plus moderate and limited weight benefits outweighed the limited weight landscape harm, leading to permission being granted for each appeal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 4Policy 5Policy 15Policy 19Policy 21Policy 22Policy 24Policy 25Policy 26Policy 27Policy 29Policy 35Policy 36Policy 39Policy 40Policy 41Policy 44Policy 45Witton Gilbert NP Policy 2Witton Gilbert NP Policy 3Witton Gilbert NP Policy 6Witton Gilbert NP Policy 7Witton Gilbert NP Policy 11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 147
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Dismissed16 September 202660059693 Roosevelt Road, Durham, DH1 1PS
- Dismissed16 September 20266004850119 Bradford Crescent, Durham, DH1 1HW
- Dismissed16 September 2026600449449 Annand Road, Durham, DH1 1PW
- Allowed10 September 2026600635255 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.