Planning appeal decision
Land at Mockbeggars Farm, London Road, Budletts Common, Uckfield, TN22 2EB
Planning appeal 3330872 at Land at Mockbeggars Farm, London Road, Budletts Common, Uckfield, TN22 2EB (Wealden District Council) was allowed on 15 March 2024 by Inspector Worden M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site lies in an appropriate location for the development proposed and whether the proposal would make the most efficient use of land having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework.
outline application for the development of 60no. dwellings, access and internal roads, parking, ancillary structures, landscaping and open space, drainage and other associated works. All matters reserved apart from access
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Worden M
- Postcode
- TN22 2EB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site lies in an appropriate location for the development proposed and whether the proposal would make the most efficient use of land having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework
- The effect of the proposal on ecology with particular regard to protected species (bats)
- The effect of the proposal on local landscape features
- The effect of the proposal on highway safety
- The effect of the proposal on heritage assets
What decided it
The absence of demonstrable harm on most main issues combined with the significant weight attached to housing and affordable housing delivery, in the context of an inability to demonstrate a five year housing land supply, meant the benefits were not significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the limited harms identified.
The very significant weight given to housing delivery, significant weight to affordable housing, substantial weight to self-build provision, and further weight to economic benefits and biodiversity net gain outweighed the limited landscape harm, less than substantial heritage harm to a non-designated asset, and limited conflict with the development plan, such that the adverse impacts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GD2Policy DC17Policy ENV8Policy EN8Policy TR3Policy WCS8Policy AFH1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed25 September 20266009517Fairfield Cottage, Cross In Hand Road, Heathfield, TN21 0SN
- Allowed15 September 20266008314Land off Eastbourne Road, Polegate, BN26 5DD
- Dismissed22 July 20266006344Dog Walking Field, Burnt Oak Road, High Hurstwood, TN22 4AE
- Dismissed17 July 20266007376Land Adjoining 154 Station Road, Hailsham, BN27 2SB
- Allowed17 July 20266005293Milton Gate Farm, Milton Street, Polegate, BN26 5RS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®