Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 July 20243330874

44-45 High Street, OXFORD, OX1 4AP

Proposed installation of an ATM to be installed through the shopfront left had window, to the left of the central entrance door and brick pier. Right of the left hand window as a through glass installation. NCR Self Serve 6626 ATM fascia with NCR 6626 A Standard Surround Signage

Authority
Oxford City Council
Appeal type
advert · Advertisement Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Other minor developments
Inspector
Pickernell E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on crime and the fear of crime in the local area

What decided it

The proposal would result in an unacceptable increase in crime and fear of crime in the local area, and the illuminated ATM signage would have a harmful effect on the character and appearance of the conservation area and the setting of nearby listed buildings.

Framework references: 96, 135

Plan policies cited: Policy DH6, Policy S1, Policy DH1, Policy DH2, Policy DH3, Policy RE7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.