Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20243330950

3 Goldsborough Crescent, Chingford, LONDON, E4 6PY

single storey side and rear extensions and two storey side extension

Authority
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pattison B

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether sufficient information has been submitted with respect to surface water drainage

What decided it

The two storey side extension would cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the area through its dominant and unbalancing effect on the semi-detached pair, contrary to local plan policies requiring high standards of design and respect for local character.

Plan policies cited: Policy CS13, Policy CS15, Policy DM4, Policy DM23, Policy DM29, Policy DM34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.