Planning appeal decision
Fox Covert Farm Fordfield Road, Millbrook, Bedford, MK45 2HZ
Planning appeal 3330992 at Fox Covert Farm Fordfield Road, Millbrook, Bedford, MK45 2HZ (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 13 February 2024 by Inspector Gunn J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy.
Retention of a single residential dwelling (personal permission) in association with the approved riding school and livery business
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Gunn J
- Postcode
- MK45 2HZ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development within the Green Belt for the purposes of the National Planning Policy Framework and development plan policy
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the occupants of the development would have reasonable access to goods and services
- The effect of the development on highway safety
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations including whether there is an essential need for a rural worker to live permanently at the site, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The absence of substantive evidence demonstrating an essential functional need for a permanent on-site rural worker's dwelling, meaning the identified Green Belt and other harms were not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
Substantial weight to the Green Belt inappropriateness and openness harm, moderate weight to character and appearance harm, and limited weight to harm from unsustainable access, against only limited weight given to the material considerations supporting the proposal, meaning the harms were not clearly outweighed and very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy SP7Policy EE5Policy HQ1Policy DC3Policy T2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154Paragraph 152Paragraph 143Paragraph 109
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®