Planning appeal decision
Land at the Rear of Home Farm, Dunstable Road, Tilsworth, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9PU
Planning appeal 3331075 at Land at the Rear of Home Farm, Dunstable Road, Tilsworth, Leighton Buzzard, LU7 9PU (Central Bedfordshire) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 13 August 2024 by Inspector Thomas N, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
the unauthorised material change of use to a residential Gypsy and Traveller site with the siting of caravans for residential use
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Thomas N
- Postcode
- LU7 9PU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt and Green Belt purposes.
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
- The effect of the development on the integrity of the Chiltern Beechwood Special Area of Conservation (SAC) which includes Ashridge Common Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) (Appeal A only).
- The general need for and supply of gypsy and traveller sites in the area (Appeal A only).
- The accommodation needs of the occupiers and their personal circumstances (Appeal A only).
- The weight to be given to other identified considerations.
- Planning and Green Belt balance.
What decided it
The unresolved conflict with the Habitats Regulations, because adverse effects on the integrity of the Chiltern Beechwoods SAC could not be excluded in the absence of secured mitigation, meant permission could not be granted regardless of the Green Belt balance.
Substantial Green Belt harm and moderate harm to character and appearance were weighed against significant weight attributed to unmet gypsy and traveller need, lack of alternative sites, and personal circumstances, but the balance was rendered moot because the unresolved SAC/Habitats Regulations conflict independently precluded the grant of permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy H7Policy EE5Policy EE3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Notice varied and upheld4 August 2026336326410 Knolls View, Totternhoe, Dunstable, LU6 2BT
- Notice upheld21 July 20263367816109 Clophill Road, Maulden, Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK45 2AD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®