Planning appeal decision
Land South of Green Lane, Chesterton, OX26 1DF
Planning appeal 3331122 at Land South of Green Lane, Chesterton, OX26 1DF (Cherwell District Council) was allowed on 15 May 2024 by Inspector Sturgess M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the location of the proposal is appropriate having regard to the facilities present in the village and other facilities accessible by sustainable means and the policies of the development plan.
outline planning application for up to 147 homes, public open space, flexible recreational playing field area and sports pitches with associated car parking, alongside landscaping, ecological enhancements, SuDs, green/blue and hard infrastructure, with vehicular and pedestrian/cycle accesses, and all associated works (all matters reserved except for means of access)
- Authority
- Cherwell District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Sturgess M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the location of the proposal is appropriate having regard to the facilities present in the village and other facilities accessible by sustainable means and the policies of the development plan
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the village and the surrounding landscape, including whether the additional housing would constitute a disproportionate extension to the village and whether any of the alleged adverse effects are capable of being mitigated
- whether the cumulative effects of the appeal proposal and other developments in and around the village would lead to the loss of its identity by closing the gap between Chesterton and Little Chesterton
What decided it
The Inspector's finding that the proposal accorded with the development plan taken as a whole, particularly the locational and character/appearance policies, meaning no material considerations (including housing land supply) indicated a decision otherwise than in accordance with the plan.
the proposal's compliance with development plan policies on location and character/appearance, together with significant weight given to housing delivery and public transport improvements, meant no material considerations indicated the appeal should be determined other than in accordance with the plan, so the appeal was allowed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy ESD1Policy ESD3Policy ESD13Policy ESD15Policy BSC1Policy Villages 1 (PV1)Policy Villages 2 (PV2)Policy C28Policy C30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 115
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cherwell District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed26 May 20266004930Land In Between Rose View and Gold Hill Cottage, Main Street, Hethe, Hethe, Oxon, OX27 8HD
- Allowed26 January 202633744992 Church View, Banbury, Oxon, OX16 9ND
- Allowed16 December 20253355576Land West of Fringford Road, Caversfield, OX27 8TJ
- Dismissed1 October 20253367723Land Adjacent 53 and 54 Hambleside, Bicester, OX26 2GB
- Allowed16 September 20253358019Land North Of Manor Farm, Noke, OX3 9TU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®