Planning appeal decision
Willaston Waters Angling & Recreational Fishing, Damhead Lane, Willaston, Neston, CH64 2TP
Planning appeal 3331265 at Willaston Waters Angling & Recreational Fishing, Damhead Lane, Willaston, Neston, CH64 2TP (Cheshire West and Chester) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 22 July 2024 by Inspector Moore D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
without planning permission, the erection of a building, erection of toilet block, storage container, new entrance wall and entrance gates
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Moore D
- Postcode
- CH64 2TP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt.
- The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The clubhouse as built was found not to be an appropriate facility for outdoor sport and recreation, causing harm to the openness of the Green Belt that was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced.
The substantial weight attributed to the harm from inappropriate development, together with limited harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations (health/social benefits, environmental benefits, economic benefits and the fallback position), so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT9Policy ENV2Policy ENV6Policy DM3
- Judgments
- Turner v SSCLG & East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466; R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) and others) (Respondents) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC; Europa Oil and Gas Ltd v SSCLG [2013] EWHC 2643 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®