Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed23 February 20243331360

6 Kings Park, Chedburgh, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP29 4TY

Planning appeal 3331360 at 6 Kings Park, Chedburgh, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP29 4TY (West Suffolk) was dismissed on 23 February 2024 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the immediate surrounding area.

a. two storey front/side extensions, b. porch extension, c. single storey side and rear extension (to form a link between the existing garage and dwelling), d. partial conversion of garage

Authority
West Suffolk
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E
Postcode
IP29 4TY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the immediate surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed two storey extension would add depth to the existing gable projection and result in a front extension that would appear out of character for both the host dwelling and the neighbouring dwellings in the immediate vicinity, contrary to Policies DM2 and DM24 and paragraph 135 of the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM2Policy DM24Policy CS3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 134Paragraph 135Paragraph 139

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

3 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266010190
    103 Westward Deals, Kedington, CB9 7PL
  2. Dismissed15 October 20266009314
    Deraleen, Baileypool Road, Packenham, IP31 2LX
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266009854
    Green Farm, Lower Green, Stoke By Clare, CO10 8HN
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006691
    Walnut Tree Barn, Thetford Road, Barnham, IP24 2PA
  5. Dismissed5 August 20266008642
    Stagwood, Thetford Road, Brandon, IP270TW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.