Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed15 July 20243331581

Flat B, 34 Turneville Road, Hammersmith and Fulham, LONDON, W14 9PS

conversion of a single family dwellinghouse into 2no. self-contained maisonettes (consisting of 1no. two bedroom and 1no. three bedroom); erection of a single storey rear extension at lower ground floor level; replacement of existing rear windows on the ground and first floor levels with new windows; without complying with a condition attached to planning permission Ref: 2018/00654/FUL, dated 20 April 2018

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Aqbal M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not condition 13 is reasonable, necessary and relevant to planning

What decided it

Condition 13 restricts the actions of individuals rather than the use of the building, and therefore fails the tests of reasonableness and relevance required by NPPF paragraph 56 for planning conditions.

Framework references: 56

Plan policies cited: Policy HO1, Policy HO2, Policy HO11, Policy T1, Policy T4, Policy CC10, Key Principle TR3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.