Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 June 20243331636

30 Denmark Road, Wimbledon , London, SW19 4PG

Create an additional bedroom by converting the roofspace. The proposal is to change the roof from a hip to gable. Roof tiles will match the existing. The gable end is proposed to be clad with tiles to match the roof but input from the conservation officers would be welcome. One roof window is proposed on the street facing side. At the rear, a dormer and 3 roof windows are proposed. The window in the dormer would be in keeping with the existing style of the dwelling. The dormer walls and roof are proposed to be clad with tiles that match with the existing roof

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Edwards J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host building and the local area
  • Whether the development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Wimbledon West Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed change from hip to gable roof form would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Wimbledon West Conservation Area, and the minor public benefits do not outweigh this harm when great weight is given to conservation of heritage assets.

Framework references: 208

Plan policies cited: HC1 London Plan 2021, CS14 Core Planning Strategy 2011, DM D2 Sites and Policies Plan and Policies Maps 2014, DM D3 Sites and Policies Plan and Policies Maps 2014, DM D4 Sites and Policies Plan and Policies Maps 2014

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.