Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20243331766

24 Bridge Drive, Christleton, Chester, CH3 6AW

Authority
Cheshire West and Chester
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Graham A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the area
  • If the proposed development is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations and whether this amounts to very special circumstances

What decided it

The cumulative harm from inappropriate development in the Green Belt, combined with harm to character and appearance through the dilution of architectural features, was not outweighed by the limited benefits advanced and therefore did not constitute very special circumstances.

Framework references: 142, 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: STRAT9, DM21, ENV6, DM3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.