Planning appeal decision
Old Apiary Site, Hatching Green, Harpenden , AL5 2JS
Planning appeal 3331897 at Old Apiary Site, Hatching Green, Harpenden , AL5 2JS (St Albans City Council) was dismissed on 11 April 2024 by Inspector Rawle S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
nine bungalows with associated hard and soft landscaping, provision of new access road within the site
- Authority
- St Albans City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Rawle S
- Postcode
- AL5 2JS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposed development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Harpenden Conservation Area
- Whether the proposed development would preserve the setting of the Grade II listed building known as 1 Thatched Cottages and the locally listed buildings known as 4 and 5 Thatched Cottages
- If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the resulting harm and any other harm is clearly outweighed by the other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and the harm to the significance of heritage assets, particularly the significant harm to the locally listed buildings, are not outweighed by the housing supply shortfall and other benefits, and the very special circumstances required to justify inappropriate Green Belt development do not exist.
The significant weight afforded to housing supply shortfall and moderate weight to housing mix and economic benefits were insufficient to outweigh the substantial weight given to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and loss of openness) and the great weight given to less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets and significant harm to non-designated heritage assets
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 1 of the St Albans District PlanPolicy 85 of the St Albans District PlanPolicy 86 of the St Albans District PlanPolicy ESD2 of the Harpenden Neighbourhood Plan 2018-2033
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 152Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in St Albans City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Planning permission granted15 September 20263311314Land at Former Butterfly World, Miriam Lane, St. Albans, Hertfordshire, AL2 3NY
- Dismissed10 July 20266008445202 Radlett Road, Frogmore, St Albans, AL2 2EN
- Planning permission granted8 July 2026337492139 The Broadway, Gustard Wood, Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire, AL4 9LW
- Notice upheld8 July 2026336000739 The Broadway, Wheathampstead, St. Albans, AL4 8LW
- Dismissed10 June 20266005367Beaumont Hall Lane, Redbourn Road, Redbourn, AL3 6RN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®