Planning appeal decision
Land at Pumping Station, Guildford Road, Bisley, Surrey, GU24 9EQ
Planning appeal 3332001 at Land at Pumping Station, Guildford Road, Bisley, Surrey, GU24 9EQ (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was allowed on 16 July 2024 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan.
Demolition of existing structures and change of use of land for the creation of 2no. Gypsy/Traveller pitches comprising the site of 1 mobile home and 1 touring caravan, alongside erection of 1 dayroom per pitch
- Authority
- Surrey Heath Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Gilbert-Wooldridge T
- Postcode
- GU24 9EQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan
- the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether the proposal represents an acceptable form of development in flood risk terms
- the effect of the proposal on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA
- whether any harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations (including the need for gypsy and traveller sites and the personal circumstances of the occupiers of the site) so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative weight of the significant unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches, the absence of alternative sites, and the personal circumstances of the family (including the best interests of the children) clearly outweighed the moderate Green Belt and highway safety harm, establishing very special circumstances.
The substantial weight attributed to unmet gypsy/traveller need, absence of a five-year pitch supply, lack of alternative sites, re-use of previously developed land, and the personal circumstances of the occupiers clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm (moderate harm to openness and purposes) and the moderate harm to highway safety, so very special circumstances were found to exist justifying the grant of permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1Policy DM6Policy DM9Policy CP11Policy DM11Policy DM10Policy CP14APolicy CP14BPolicy CP7Policy NRM6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 165Paragraph 168Paragraph 169Paragraph 170Paragraph 173Paragraph 57
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed18 September 202660121062 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
- Dismissed1 July 20266003913Wilds, The Folly, Lightwater, GU18 5XA
- Allowed21 May 20266002295Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
- Dismissed1 May 20263376162Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
- Allowed17 April 20263374712Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®