Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed16 July 20243332001

Land at Pumping Station, Guildford Road, Bisley, Surrey, GU24 9EQ

Planning appeal 3332001 at Land at Pumping Station, Guildford Road, Bisley, Surrey, GU24 9EQ (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was allowed on 16 July 2024 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan.

Demolition of existing structures and change of use of land for the creation of 2no. Gypsy/Traveller pitches comprising the site of 1 mobile home and 1 touring caravan, alongside erection of 1 dayroom per pitch

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T
Postcode
GU24 9EQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be in a suitable location having regard to the development plan
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • whether the proposal represents an acceptable form of development in flood risk terms
  • the effect of the proposal on the Thames Basin Heaths SPA
  • whether any harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations (including the need for gypsy and traveller sites and the personal circumstances of the occupiers of the site) so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The cumulative weight of the significant unmet need for gypsy and traveller pitches, the absence of alternative sites, and the personal circumstances of the family (including the best interests of the children) clearly outweighed the moderate Green Belt and highway safety harm, establishing very special circumstances.

The substantial weight attributed to unmet gypsy/traveller need, absence of a five-year pitch supply, lack of alternative sites, re-use of previously developed land, and the personal circumstances of the occupiers clearly outweighed the substantial Green Belt harm (moderate harm to openness and purposes) and the moderate harm to highway safety, so very special circumstances were found to exist justifying the grant of permission.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP1Policy DM6Policy DM9Policy CP11Policy DM11Policy DM10Policy CP14APolicy CP14BPolicy CP7Policy NRM6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 108Paragraph 109Paragraph 114Paragraph 115Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 165Paragraph 168Paragraph 169Paragraph 170Paragraph 173Paragraph 57

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

79 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed18 September 20266012106
    2 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
  2. Dismissed1 July 20266003913
    Wilds, The Folly, Lightwater, GU18 5XA
  3. Allowed21 May 20266002295
    Land At Snows Ride, Windlesham, Surrey, GU20 6LA
  4. Dismissed1 May 20263376162
    Langshot Equestrian Centre, Gracious Pond Road, Chobham, Woking, GU24 8HJ
  5. Allowed17 April 20263374712
    Newlyn, Highams Lane, Chobham, Surrey, GU24 8TD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.