Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 May 20243332089

Land West of London Lane, Ascott Under Wychwood, Oxfordshire, OX7 6AB

Planning appeal 3332089 at Land West of London Lane, Ascott Under Wychwood, Oxfordshire, OX7 6AB (West Oxfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 3 May 2024 by Inspector Troy D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the location of the proposed development is appropriate in principle in terms of the policy approach to housing development in Ascott under Wychwood.

outline planning application with all matters reserved (except for access) for the development of up to 40 residential dwellings (C3 use), including 50% affordable housing, with vehicular access from London Lane. Provision of associated public open space, alongside landscaping, drainage infrastructure, and associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Troy D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the location of the proposed development is appropriate in principle in terms of the policy approach to housing development in Ascott under Wychwood
  • Whether the Council can demonstrate a five year supply of housing land
  • The effect of the proposed development on the setting and significance of the designated heritage assets, namely the Grade II* listed Church of the Holy Trinity, Grade II listed Crown Farmhouse and Grade II listed buildings at Nos. 9 & 11 The Green
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area having particular regard to the effect on the Cotswolds Natural Landscape
  • Whether there are any exceptional circumstances which justify major development with the Cotswolds Natural Landscape and whether such development would be in the public interest
  • Whether the policies which are most important for determining the application are out of date due to a lack of a five year supply of housing land or any other reason and, if so, would any adverse impacts of the proposed development significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits

What decided it

The harm to the Cotswolds Natural Landscape (AONB) and to the setting of designated heritage assets was not outweighed by the housing benefits, and no exceptional circumstances or public interest justification under paragraph 183 of the Framework was demonstrated.

The substantial benefits of market and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate economic and environmental benefits, did not outweigh the significant harm to the character and appearance of the Cotswolds Natural Landscape and the less than substantial harm to the setting of heritage assets, so the balance tipped against the proposal

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy OS1Policy OS2Policy OS4Policy H1Policy H2Policy H3Policy BC1Policy EH1Policy EH2Policy EH9Policy EH11Policy EH13Policy EW2Policy EW4Policy EW5Policy CA1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 77Paragraph 135Paragraph 182Paragraph 183Paragraph 195Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208
Judgments
Wealden v. SSCLG AND Knight Development Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 39; Cala Management Limited v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & West Oxfordshire District Council [2019] CO/3061/2019Y

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

7 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in West Oxfordshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed13 October 20266004776
    Land South of Ramsden, Akeman Street, Ramsden, OX7 3AY
  2. Allowed9 September 20266007705
    Forge Garage, Church Road, Churchill, OX7 6NJ
  3. Dismissed5 May 20266002714
    Land at Main Road, Alvescot, West Oxfordshire, OX18 2PU
  4. Dismissed28 April 20266001930
    Land at Drive to Butlers Farm Road, Alvescot, Alvescot, Oxfordshire, OX18 2PU
  5. Allowed17 April 20253352062
    Fir Tree Farm, Barnard Gate, Witney, Oxfordshire, OX29 6XE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.