Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 May 20243332228

Watermead Estate, Buckingham Road, Aylesbury, HP19 0GF

development of 21 no. two-bedroom flats with parking

Authority
Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Shearing C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would provide a satisfactory standard of accommodation for its future occupants, with particular regard to outdoor amenity space, the size of accommodation, noise and accessibility
  • Whether the proposal would make appropriate provisions to address climate change
  • Whether the proposed unit types are appropriate with regard to identified need
  • Whether the proposal would make appropriate contributions towards affordable housing and infrastructure

What decided it

The cumulative conflict with multiple development plan policies regarding character and appearance, living conditions, climate change, housing mix, and infrastructure contributions could not be outweighed by the housing supply benefits.

The benefits of new housing on a brownfield site with good accessibility and the potential for active frontage were outweighed by the substantial and long-lasting harms to character and appearance, living conditions, climate change mitigation, housing mix, affordable housing provision and infrastructure contributions.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy BE2, Policy NE8, Policy BE3, Policy H6c, Policy C3, Policy H6a, Policy H1, Policy I2, Policy I3, Policy I1, Policy T8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.