Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 October 20243332408

222 Upminster Road South, RAINHAM, RM13 9BH

erection of 3 bedroom self-contained dwellinghouse adjacent to the existing dwelling

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed dwelling on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed dwelling would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants with regard to ceiling height
  • The effect of the proposal on the safe and efficient operation of the local highway network with regard to parking provision

What decided it

The cumulative effect of three policy conflicts—harm to character and appearance, inadequate living conditions due to ceiling height, and insufficient parking provision—combined with moderate housing benefits that did not outweigh these adverse impacts under the tilted balance test.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions, and parking deficiency would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the moderate positive weight afforded to housing land supply benefits and economic and social benefits, such that the proposal would not constitute a sustainable form of development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy D4 of the London Plan 2021, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 10 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy 24 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031, Policy T6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy T6.1 of the London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.