Planning appeal decision
Land Fronting Lingfield Road, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex, RH19 2JW
Planning appeal 3332537 at Land Fronting Lingfield Road, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, West Sussex, RH19 2JW (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 15 May 2024 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
A self build, two-storey Passivhaus dwelling of exceptional quality, achieving an A+ embodied carbon rating, fully compliant with the requirements of Approved Document M4(3) for wheelchair accessible dwellings, to be appropriate for use by its elderly occupants. Extensive landscape and biodiversity improvements will be incorporated throughout the rest of the application site
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Carpenter C
- Postcode
- RH19 2JW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether the proposal would be in a suitable location in respect to the settlement pattern and local services and facilities
- whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The substantial weight required to be given to harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and openness, combined with considerable harm to the settlement pattern, was not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight given to self-build delivery and limited weights given to other considerations, so very special circumstances do not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by inappropriateness and considerable harm to openness, together with considerable harm to settlement pattern, were not clearly outweighed by moderate weight for self-build delivery and limited weights for economic benefits, energy efficiency, biodiversity enhancements, and design quality, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014 Policy DP10Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014 Policy DP13Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014 Policy DP1Tandridge District Core Strategy 2008 Policy CSP1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 84Paragraph 152Paragraph 153Paragraph 154
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®