Planning appeal decision
35 Ridgeway , Kensworth, Bedfordshire, LU6 3RL
Planning appeal 3332549 at 35 Ridgeway , Kensworth, Bedfordshire, LU6 3RL (Central Bedfordshire) was dismissed on 24 July 2024 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development proposed would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
erection of detached dwelling
- Authority
- Central Bedfordshire
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Chalk M
- Postcode
- LU6 3RL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development proposed would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the wider Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- Whether it would provide acceptable living conditions in terms of internal and garden space for future occupiers of the proposed house and the occupiers of the existing house No 35 Ridgeway
- The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to overlooking of Nos 2-8 Plewes Close
- Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness and character, fail to provide acceptable living conditions, and the benefits of providing one new house do not clearly outweigh these harms to justify very special circumstances.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP4Policy HQ1Policy EE7Policy H2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Central Bedfordshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 September 20266007334Hillcrest, Chalton, Luton, LU4 9UB
- Allowed4 September 202660072022 Park Farm, Park Road, Westoning, MK45 5LA
- Dismissed7 August 20266007254Wheatsheaf Barn, Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, MK178JZ
- Dismissed10 July 20266005439263 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, LU3 3PP
- Dismissed8 July 20266007697142 Sharpenhoe Road, Streatley, Luton, LU3 3PS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®