Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20243332556

Land Adjacent to 24 Courtenay Road , London, Greater London, E11 3PY

Planning appeal 3332556 at Land Adjacent to 24 Courtenay Road , London, Greater London, E11 3PY (Waltham Forest London Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 September 2024 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

construction of two storey end of terrace building to provide 1 x 2-bedroom single dwelling house with associated soft and hard landscaping, two car parking spaces, refuse/recycling and bicycle storages

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Veevers A
Postcode
E11 3PY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to private outdoor amenity space, configuration of internal living space, outlook, daylight, sunlight and privacy
  • the effect of the proposed development on the Epping Forest Special Area for Conservation (SAC)
  • whether the proposed development would have an adverse effect on parking stress, highway infrastructure, sustainable modes of transport and climate change
  • whether the proposed development makes appropriate provision for refuse/recycling storage and cycle parking

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance combined with failure to provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers (particularly regarding private outdoor amenity space and daylight/sunlight) and the absence of secured mitigation for the Epping Forest SAC, together with the lack of a mechanism to ensure car-free development, collectively outweighed the moderate benefits of providing one additional dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 5 WFLPPolicy 53 WFLPPolicy 56 WFLPPolicy 60 WFLPPolicy 61 WFLPPolicy 66 WFLPPolicy 81 WFLPPolicy 93 WFLPPolicy 94 WFLPPolicy D1 London PlanPolicy D4 London PlanPolicy D6 London Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 34Paragraph 35Paragraph 55Paragraph 57Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

599 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Waltham Forest London Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 September 20266011324
    L/A to 2 Claremont Road, London, E17 5RJ
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266011375
    Land to R/O 34-40 Hillcrest Road, Walthamstow, E17 4AP
  3. Allowed21 July 20266006927
    8 Mulberry Close, Chingford, London, E4 8BS
  4. Allowed16 July 20266007500
    38 Second Avenue, Walthamstow, London, E17 9QH
  5. Dismissed22 May 20266003136
    52 Withy Mead, Chingford, Waltham Forest, E4 6JZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.