Planning appeal decision
Pinegroves Caravan Park, High Lane, Tansley, Matlock, DE4 5BG
Planning appeal 3332574 at Pinegroves Caravan Park, High Lane, Tansley, Matlock, DE4 5BG (North East Derbyshire District Council) was allowed on 11 December 2024 by Inspector Preston C, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the extant permissions have the effect of controlling the numbers of static and touring caravans that can lawfully be sited on the land.
Use of land for the siting of static and touring caravans, without any control on the number of each
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Preston C
- Postcode
- DE4 5BG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the extant permissions have the effect of controlling the numbers of static and touring caravans that can lawfully be sited on the land
- Whether the Council's decision to refuse the application was well-founded, having regard to relevant facts and caselaw
What decided it
The 1994 and/or 2003 permissions, properly interpreted as variations of condition 6 under s.73 covering the whole site, removed the restriction on static caravans without substituting any numerical or type control, rendering the unrestricted use lawful.
What the Inspector cited
- Judgments
- Adams v SSHCLG & Huntingdonshire District Council [2020] EWHC 3076 (Admin); London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State [2019] 1 W.L.R. 4317; R. (on the application of Wyatt) v Fareham BC, 2021 WL 02192846 (2021); LB of Richmond Upon Thames v R. on the application of Owolabi Ariyo [2024] EWCA Civ 960; Barnett v SSCLG [2009] EWCA Civ 476; Newbury District Council v SSE & Newbury District Council v International Synthetic Rubber Co. Ltd. [1980] 2 W.L.R 379, [1981] AC578; Barton Park Estates Ltd v SSHCLG & anon [2022] EWCA Civ 833
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in North East Derbyshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 October 20266012903Croft Farm, Hungerhill Lane, Stonedge, Ashover, Chesterfield, S45 0LP
- Allowed22 September 20263376000Sunny Bank, White Lane , Ridgway , Sheffield, S12 3GB
- Allowed17 September 20266010764Prestedge Barn, Whitefield Lane, Ashover, S45 0HZ
- Dismissed15 September 20266011330Land and Buildings to the South of Cowley Lane, Dronfield, S18 7UR
- Dismissed11 September 2026601164813 Temperance Hill, Woolley Moor, DE55 6FJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®