Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 May 20243332626

127 Chase Cross Road, Romford, RM5 3YS

Planning appeal 3332626 at 127 Chase Cross Road, Romford, RM5 3YS (London Borough of Havering) was dismissed on 20 May 2024 by Inspector Carpenter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

demolition of existing garage and erection of detached one bedroom bungalow with off street parking and garden space

Authority
London Borough of Havering
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Carpenter C
Postcode
RM5 3YS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • highway safety, with particular reference to parking

What decided it

The harms to character and appearance and highway safety, attributed considerable weight, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of housing delivery under the tilted balance test.

The harms to character and appearance and highway safety, attributed considerable weight, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits of the proposal when assessed against the Framework as a whole, notwithstanding the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
HLP Policy 10HLP Policy 24HLP Policy 26LP Policy D4LP Policies T6LP Policies T6.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 115

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

197 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Havering

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 May 20266001193
    Archers Apartments, 27 Haysoms Close, Romford, Havering, RM1 4DL
  2. Dismissed21 May 20266004142
    1 Abbots Close, Havering, Rainham, Essex, RM13 9LA
  3. Dismissed21 May 20266003382
    Rear of 73 Front Lane, Upminster, RM14 1XL
  4. Allowed15 May 20266005087
    Land to the Rear of 55-67 Petersfield Avenue, Harold Hill, Romford, Havering, RM3 9PR
  5. Dismissed30 April 20266000610
    10 Parkland Avenue, Upminster, Upminster, RM14 2HA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.