Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20243332964

32 CROMWELL GROVE , HAMMERSMITH , LONDON, LONDON, W6 7RG

‘erection of a rear roof extension; erection of a dormer to the side roofslope erection of a side infill extension to the existing third floor back addition; installation of a rooflight in the front roofslope; erection of a balustrade on top of flat roof of third floor back addition, in connection with its use as a roof terrace’

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the area, with special attention to the Melrose Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area, and the limited public benefits do not outweigh the great weight given to the conservation of this heritage asset.

Framework references: 208, 12, 16

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.