Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 May 20243332988

Chain House Nursery, Chain House Lane, Preston, PR4 4LB

demolition of existing polytunnels and redevelopment of the infill site allowing four bungalows in keeping with the surrounding properties

Authority
South Ribble Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that does not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and moderate harm to openness, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist to justify it.

Framework references: 142, 152, 153, 154

Plan policies cited: Policy G1, Policy F1, Policy G13, Policy G16, Policy G17, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 1, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 3, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 4, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 5, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 6, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 17, Central Lancashire Adopted Core Strategy Policy 29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.