Planning appeal decision
Pavement at Mere Green Road, Mere Green, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B75 5BW
Planning appeal 3332997 at Pavement at Mere Green Road, Mere Green, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, B75 5BW (Birmingham City Council) was allowed on 2 April 2024 by Inspector Ollerenshaw M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
the installation of a 17.5m high streetworks column supporting 6 no. antennas, 2 no. 0.3m dishes and ancillary equipment. The installation of 2 no. equipment cabinets and development ancillary thereto
- Authority
- Birmingham City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Ollerenshaw M
- Postcode
- B75 5BW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm to character and appearance would be outweighed by the need to site the installation in the proposed location, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites
What decided it
The absence of suitable alternative sites to deliver the required telecommunications coverage and capacity justified the proposal despite the moderate harm to character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy PG3 of the Birmingham Development Plan (2017)Policy DM16 of the Development Management in Birmingham Development Plan Document (2021)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 118Paragraph 121
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Birmingham City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed23 March 20263376018Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 8HW
- Dismissed23 March 20263375839Footpath Outside 7 St Mary’s Row, Moseley, Birmingham
- Dismissed23 March 20263375725Footpath Outside 86C Old Snow Hill, Birmingham, B4 6HW
- Dismissed28 August 20253365270Stratford Road, Hall Green, Birmingham, B28 9EF
- Allowed22 August 20253366060Jamia Masjid Haroonia, 766 Alum Rock Road, Birmingham, B8 3PX
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®