Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 October 20243333287

Wrotham Hill Cottage, Wrotham Hill, Dunsfold, Surrey, GU8 4PA

Use of roof space of the garage building for the purposes of habitable accommodation – contrary to condition 2 of consent WA/2003/2383

Authority
Waverley Borough Council
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Curnow R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The main issue in both appeals is whether the Council's decisions to refuse to issue certificates of lawfulness were well-founded.

What decided it

In Appeal A the container's size, degree of permanence and weight-based attachment to the land led to a finding that it constituted a 'building' and operational development; in Appeal B, post-Hearing additional evidence proved on the balance of probability that the ancillary residential use of the roof space had continued for the requisite ten years.

Judgments cited: Cardiff Rating Authority v Guest Keen Baldwin's Iron and Steel Co Ltd [1949] 1QB 385; Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (No. 2) [2002] EWCA Civ 5569; Barvis Limited SSE and Anor [171] P&CR 1710; Cheshire CC v Woodward [1962] 2 QB 126; Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.