Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of Myhaven, Woods Lane, Cliddesden, Hampshire, RG25 2JG
Planning appeal 3333310 at Land to the South of Myhaven, Woods Lane, Cliddesden, Hampshire, RG25 2JG (Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 October 2024 by Inspector Cliff D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development reflects the Council's development strategy.
the erection of 28 new dwellings following the demolition of Newland Lodge
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Cliff D
- Postcode
- RG25 2JG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development reflects the Council's development strategy
- The effect upon the character and appearance of the area
- Whether the proposals would preserve the setting of (i) the Cliddesden Conservation Area, (ii) nearby listed buildings at Cliddesden Down House, Manor Farmhouse and 10 Woods Lane and (iii) that of other non-designated heritage assets
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, including the introduction of substantial urban development into the countryside at the edge of the village, demonstrably outweighed the housing and other benefits when assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole.
The considerable social benefits from market and affordable housing, modest social benefits from open space provision, moderate environmental benefits from biodiversity net gain and modest economic benefits from construction were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse effects upon character and appearance and the setting and significance of designated heritage assets.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy SS6Policy EM1Policy EM10Policy EM11Policy SD1Policy DD1Policy DD2Policy DD3Policy H1Policy HD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 139Paragraph 205Paragraph 206Paragraph 208Paragraph 226
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Basingstoke and Deane
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed26 October 20266011048Purdues Farm, Mortimer Lane, Fair Oak Green, Stratfield Saye, RG7 2DL
- Allowed26 October 2026600755075 Park Prewett Road, Basingstoke, RG24 9RG
- Dismissed20 October 20266011464Old Kiln House, Silchester Road, Tadley, RG263PX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011822Spindles, Winchester Road, Burghclere, RG20 9DX
- Dismissed13 October 20266011099Locksbridge Farm, Cufaude Lane, Bramley, RG26 5DL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®