Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed25 June 20243333587

275 Radford Boulevard, Nottingham, NG7 5QJ

Planning appeal 3333587 at 275 Radford Boulevard, Nottingham, NG7 5QJ (Nottingham City Council) was allowed on 25 June 2024 by Inspector Savage K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the change of use on the creation and maintenance of a balanced community.

change of use from C3 to C4 6 beds HMO

Authority
Nottingham City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Savage K
Postcode
NG7 5QJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the change of use on the creation and maintenance of a balanced community
  • The effect on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with respect to noise and disturbance

What decided it

The absence of specific evidence of adverse impacts on community balance or neighbours' living conditions, combined with the suitability of the inner urban location for HMO accommodation, meant the policy thresholds being exceeded were insufficient by themselves to justify refusal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 8 of the Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local PlanPolicy HO1 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan DocumentPolicy HO2 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan DocumentPolicy HO6 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan DocumentPolicy 10 of the Aligned Core Strategies Part 1 Local PlanPolicy DE1 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan DocumentPolicy TR1 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan DocumentPolicy IN2 of the Land and Planning Policies Development Plan Document

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

164 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Nottingham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012324
    291 Wigman Road, Nottingham, NG8 4AJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266012812
    27 Western Boulevard, Nottingham, NG8 1PE
  3. Dismissed2 October 20266011302
    14-16 Hendon Rise, Nottingham, NG3 3AN
  4. Dismissed17 September 20266010946
    38 Highfield Road, Nottingham, NG7 2JE
  5. Dismissed15 June 20266004681
    79-81 Flat Above, Haydn Road, Nottingham, NG5 2LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.